Tag Archives: Star Trek

Where A Tarantino Star Trek Could Go

The rumor that Quentin Tarantino is developing a Star Trek film is gaining traction again, now with reports that he’s met with J.J. Abrams and Paramount to work on a script, but It’s all still in super early stages. I have some ideas on what it could lead to, and also a few misgivings on Tarantino taking on a Star Trek film. And do note that I’m a massive fan of both Tarantino and Star Trek.

Tarantino Trek

Tarantino has expressed interest in doing a Trek film before, mostly as a fully fleshed out 2 hour plus version of the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” (I’ll go into that later) which he went into on his Nerdist Podcast episode (relevant conversation starts about the one hour, eight minute mark). Earlier in that episode, he talked about how earlier in his career (I think it was just after Pulp Fiction) he toyed with the idea of doing a Luke Cage film, but he wasn’t confident in his ability to manage fan expectation, as he just wants to make HIS Luke Cage movie. And he’d want to make HIS Star Trek movie. I don’t think Tarantino could make HIS Trek movie while balancing studio notes and fan demands, both of whom are trying to “protect the brand.” So, much like last year’s Tarantino/Deadpool petition, as much as I’d love to see a Tarantino Trek film, two things I love, I don’t think we’d get a Tarantino Trek film, we’d get a Trek film with Tarantino’s name on it. Tarantino and franchises just aren’t a good fit. He’s got too defined a style and vision, that doesn’t jive with the studio goals for franchising films and creating cinematic universes.

That said: A fully fleshed out “Yesterday’s Enterprise” would be fantastic to fill in the holes only vaguely alluded to in the episode/franchise. And if I thought for one second that Tarantino would be allowed to make HIS Trek, I’ll be the first on board and in line to watch it. I think Paramount would do well to maybe do…. I guess an anthology franchise would be the best way to put it. They’ve got this big enormous sandbox of potential stories that have only ever been mentioned in the shows, in addition to a wide range of possibilities for Trek post-Voyager. Give some filmmakers carte blanche to make a Trek film. They don’t even need massive budgets to make it work. Tarantino could probably make a damn good one for $30million. Give the filmmakers a handful of guidelines to stick to so it’s still TREK, but otherwise, be bold.

Maybe test the waters with rebooting or remaking old stories (like “Yesterday’s Enterprise”) so you’re still kind of playing it safe, but going kinda wild with it. And the anthology comes in with “First movie is about this thing, second is about another thing with different characters, third is yet another story with still more different characters.” It’s kinda sorta what Disney/Lucasfilm is doing with Star Wars, kinda sorta what Disney/Marvel is doing with the MCU, but if they approach it right, as in, “Yeah, they’re all connected, it’s a big universe, but no one thing explicitly relies on or feeds into the other. They’re all their own thing.” Don’t make it an event. Just make it exist.

IF, and BIG IF, Tarantino’s talks with Abrams and Paramount do lead somewhere, I would actually love a full “Yesterday’s Enterprise,” movie. Full back story, Yesterday’s Enterprise is about Captain Picard’s Enterprise D encountering a temporal anomaly, with the Enterprise C breaking through from its own time 20 years in the past to join Picard in the present. The Enterprise C scored a decisive, yet sacrificial victory at the Battle of Narendra III, which saved the Klingons from a Romulan double cross. What’s important to note is that at the time of this battle, The Klingons and Romulans were allies against the Federation, but were in the middle of peace talks at Khitomer. The Federation’s sacrifice to save the Klingons, coupled with the Romulan betrayal, led to the Khitomer Accords being signed, aided by Captain Spock and Curzon Dax representing the Federation, and a longstanding peace treaty with the Klingons. But with the Enterprise C removed from that battle due to the aforementioned temporal anomaly, that battle ends differently, the treaty is never signed, and the Federation is in a longstanding war with the Klingons and Romulans.

“Yesterday’s Enterprise” stands as one of the best of that entire series, if not the entire 50 year history of the franchise, and I would love to see it bulked out and expanded on. There is a lot to that story that Tarantino could dive into. Tarantino’s ability to deftly maneuver between multiple story lines, in a fractured timeline, would make this a perfect marriage of art and artist.

Ultimately, I’m skeptical, but optimistically so.


First Trailer for Star Trek: Discovery- I’m Excited & Nervous

Star Trek: Discovery, starring Sonequa Martin Green, Michelle Yeoh, Jason Isaacs, Doug Jones, Shazad Latif & Anthony Rapp.

Right up top, it’s getting a 15 episode order instead of 13. That’s good. That cast. Also very good.

The thing that’s bugged me since they first announced we’re going to barely pre-Kirk era Starfleet, is that we haven’t had a Trek take place in the in-universe future since 2002, when Nemesis came out. Everything since, from Enterprise, to Kelvin-verse (official name for the Abrams films), and now back to Trek-prime with Discovery is all prequel based. For a series, a franchise, that was so forward focused, so progressive, it’s a difficult pill to swallow seeing it so regressive. DS9 and Voyager handed the franchise the Gamma and Delta quadrants to explore, Voyager gave us the 29th century’s Temporal Integrity Commission to to explore, basically handing us 400 years worth of space exploration left untouched. Think about everything that’s happened since 1617. All the discoveries and exploration that was done. And we keep getting, “Yeah, Ferdinand Magellan was awesome, so was this other guy who was Magellan adjacent. By the way, we eventually go to the moon, but how ’bout that Magellan guy, huh?! HUH?! Sailing and shit.”

There was another announcement that came with the “Slightly Before Kirk” decision was that it was to be anthologized. Bryan Fuller shot that down, but now he’s gone, so who knows? But they won’t anthologize it because that’s not how Trek works. That screws up the human element of Trek. I don’t mean humans as a species, but human as in connecting with the characters. They also won’t because they didn’t with Heroes, like they were supposed to, because “Oh, Character A is popular, so let’s keep them around forever.”

The other thing that gives me pause is how much of an influence the Kelvin-verse films will have on the series. Not the stories told, obviously, but the storytelling. They were decidedly more aggressive, more militaristic. Lots of space battles, destruction, death, and violent ends. Not that I have a problem with that, but will that do away with the core of Trek, the aims at peace and understanding and utopia? Klingons were the villains in OTS, and were allies by TNG. TNG had the Ferengi, who joined the Federation by the end of DS9. The Borg were huge villains across 3 shows and a movie, but both TNG and VOY had episodes where they were trying to understand and come to terms with the Borg. The Romulans, the Cardassians… they were hinted at becoming friendlies at some point in the future. Of the prime-verse, not just some weird Mirror-verse. That’s not to say the path to peace wasn’t littered with conflicts, battles or wars. But there was still that path. And Kelvin-verse sort of ignored that.

I’m excited to have Trek back on TV. That’s where it belongs. That’s where it thrives. I’m just more than a little nervous for what they may do with it (knowing studio people) and this trailer does little to ease those apprehensions. But it does look pretty cool. And as a lifelong Trek fan, I’ll watch every episode as it “airs,” so to speak.

But my point still stands: Let’s explore more of the unknown, and less of what we mostly know. I’d probably be OK not having those gaps filled.

Stuff That’s Streaming: Star Trek and Lots Of It

Similar to last week’s entry regarding The X-Files and my trip down memory lane, this is about another revisit of my youth, this time in the form of high nerdery, the wonderful mythos that is Star Trek.

I originally conceived the idea of going on a Star Trek binge and watching all the TV Shows and Movies in as short a time span as possible way back when I was unemployed and had literally nothing else to do (aside from job hunting). Disregarding the animated series, if you were to watch every episode of every series, and every movie, in the in-universe chronological order (Enterprise through Deep Space 9), I figured it would take roughly 22.8 days of non-stop viewing. I wouldn’t be able to do that then, nor now, but it was an idea I kicked around, but never fulfilled.

Then a few months ago the wonderful documentary The Captains showed up in my Netflix recommendations, I watched it, and decided to get started on watching Star Trek. Though I broke from the original idea by starting with The Next Generation, instead of Enterprise. The titles and images are clickable links to the Netflix stream.

The Captains

The Captains

All the Star Trek Captains, excluding Pike.

The pop-cultural significance of this piece of film should not go unnoticed at all. It’s nothing fancy. Just the Original Series Captain, Kirk, William Shatner, taking a film crew and discussing Star Trek, one of the biggest franchises in history, with all of the other Trek Captains – TNG‘s Picard (Patrick Stewart), DS9‘s Sisko (Avery Brooks); Voyager‘s Janeway (Kate Mulgrew); Enterprise‘s Archer (Scott Bakula); and new, young Kirk from the reboot movie, Chris Pine.

It’s truly fascinating to see these 6 people together on film, though unfortunately not all at the same time. You get a behind the curtain look at what it was like (for most of them, excluding Shatner, obviously) to enter this phenomenon of a TV/Movie series, coming from their varied backgrounds, and how it impacted their careers. It’s a fun sit-down and chat style interview between director Shatner and his 5 successors (or, predecessor, technically, in Bakula’s case) to the Captain’s Chair. Shatner does focus on himself quite a bit, as he tends to do, and is more than allowed to do. As someone who grew up on Trek, I watched from beginning to end with eager ears to hear the charming stories each would tell from their time in Starfleet.

You can catch the entire film here on Netflix, and I highly recommend it for anyone who’s had even a passing interest in Star Trek at some point in their lives.

Star Trek (all of them)

Star Trek: The Next Generation

Cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation

And then there’s of course what led me directly to that: the shows. I grew up on first The Next Generation, moving straight into DS9 and Voyager. I of course caught reruns of The Original Series back when SyFy was Sci-Fi, and actually showed Sci-Fi. I never watched Enterprise, which is surprising to even me considering I’m a big fan of both Star Trek and Bakula’s previous series, Quantum Leap. But I’ve recently started reliving my time with TNG, even tweeting about (#RelivingTNG). I finally got over the Tasha Yar/Beardless Riker hump and I’m at the point where it’s starting to get good. I’m probably going to keep pushing through TNG, taking each series at a time, and if you want to check out Star Trek, either again, or for the first time, do it.

All 3 seasons of The Original Series are streaming here.

All 7 seasons of The Next Generation are streaming here.

All 7 seasons of Deep Space Nine are streaming here.

All 7 seasons of Voyager are streaming here.

All 4 seasons of Enterprise are streaming here.

Top 10 Films of 2009

I had to hold off a bit wait to catch up with the limited releases to finally make their way up to Marquette, and I knew there were a couple flicks coming to DVD in early January that I wanted to see, so I waited to complete the list. But I think that I’ve seen all I’m going to see of 2009 for a while, so I’ll go ahead and lock in my Top 10 of 09 now. In order, 10 to 1:

Sam Rockwell in Moon10) Moon

Moon encapsulates what I envision to be “adult sci-fi.” Sure, there is something to be said about the big action adventure sci-fi that dominates the box office. But while those films put the heavy focus on the fiction half, Moon and films like it (recently Children of Men and Sunshine) never forget the science half. And Duncan Jones (son of David Bowie) in his directorial gives us a riveting, minimalist psychological thriller. Sam Rockwell delivers one of the best performances of the year.

9) Where The Wild Things AreWhere The Wild Things Are

Spike Jonze’s take on Maurice Sendak’s classic book is gloriously realized love story with childhood. He perfectly captures what it’s like to be a kid, and how an active imagination is how they (we) cope with things we’re not fully ready to cope with. Max Records’ performance is one of the finest given by such a young performer.

Zach Galifianakis, Ed Helms and Bradley Cooper in The Hangover8 ) The Hangover

The Hangover was a movie where it was a group of very funny and very talented people got together and made a solidly funny movie that connected with people. It didn’t rely on marquee names or some kind of gimmick. It was enough to just be funny. It’s turned Zach Galifianakis into one of the most in demand comics and Bradley Cooper into a household name.

7) ZombielandThe cast of Zombieland

Zombieland was an exercise in entertainment. It was a genuinely funny film with a cast that fit together perfectly. You’re not going to find a message in the film. But you will find a point. That point? Have a good time. Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisinberg and Emma Stone are pitch perfect, the cameo from Bill Murray is an unexpected delight, and the film finds that perfect blend of action, horror and comedy.

Carl Frederickson of the movie Up6) Up

If someone were to come back from the future and tell me that eventually, Pixar makes a bad film, I wouldn’t believe them at all. When you go to a Pixar film, you know you’re getting quality animation, a well told story, and a joy ride of entertainment, and Up is no different. Five minutes in, I’m in tears. On an animated flick. The folks at Pixar are master storytellers.

5) Inglourious BasterdsChristoph Waltz as Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds

While Abrams’ Star Trek wasn’t fully deserving of the “slick” label, Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds certainly is. I said in my original review that I would have been more likely to pay attention in eleventh grade history class had Tarantino written the textbook. It’s pure escapism with a knowing hint of schlock, but that’s what makes it so good. And German actor Christoph Waltz, as the pure evil SS Col. Hans Landa, gives one of the top 10 performances of the decade.

An bomb tech hurled from an explosion in The Hurt Locker4) The Hurt Locker

Not just in reality, but in the movies, the Iraq War hasn’t been the success people were hoping. It’s failed to catch on with movie audiences the way Vietnam and WWII did. But it just need that one film to really pull into focus. Leave the politics aside, and just show the war. The combat. The bomb techs. And Kathryn Bigelow perfectly captured it. It’s one of the most intense cinematic experiences of the year. Jeremy Renner’s star making performance as SSgt. William James, a bomb tech in Iraq is full of the machismo we’ve come to expect in war movies, but there’s a subtlety to him that won’t hit you till the end.

3) Star TrekKirk, Scotty, McCoy, Sulu and Uhura of Star Trek

Whoever said mainstream, big budget adventure flicks can’t be good, J.J. Abrams has something to say. Abrams acknowledges and respects the legacy of the Star Trek franchise, and gives it an update for the dawning of a new generation. I wouldn’t say it’s a “slick update,” but more of just an update. He brings the old school adventure spirit into the new and evolved world of sci-fi, translating it perfectly. And above everyone else, the young, mostly green, cast had the daunting task of filling the shoes of these iconic characters and the icons who originally played them. And once the dust settled, Chris Pine is Kirk.

George Clooney and Anna Kendrick in 'Up In The Air'2) Up In The Air

At times both comical and poignant. Jason Reitman’s best film to date is an amazing showcase for what highly talented people can do when they come together to make  a film that is just all around good. George Clooney has never been better, Vera Farmiga shows that when given the chance, she can shine, and Anna Kendrick gives a breakthrough performance that should earn her an Oscar nomination and more film offers for a good several years. Jason Reitman is becoming the Pixar of well scripted dramadies, can he make a bad movie?

1) District 9District 9

When I first saw the trailer for District 9, I was hooked, but I didn’t know it was to become the film that I ended up loving so much. It was such an intelligent film that looked at an otherwise standard sci-fi plot device (aliens come to Earth) through a more pragmatic and realistic lens. Newcomer Sharlto Copley gives one of the most engaging performances, of any genre, of the year, and Neill Blomkamp set himself up as one of the premiere sci-fi auteurs of the generation.